skip to main content
Show Results with:
Refined by: List of all Versions remove
Result Number Material Type Add to My Shelf Action Record Details and Options
1
Material Type:
Article
Add to My workspace

Correction: Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) in Clinical Trials: Is ‘In-Trial’ Guidance Lacking? A Systematic Review

PLoS ONE, 2014, Vol.9(1) [Peer Reviewed Journal]

U.S. National Library of Medicine (NIH/NLM)

No full-text

2
Material Type:
Article
Add to My workspace

Correction: Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) in Clinical Trials: Is ‘In-Trial’ Guidance Lacking? A Systematic Review

PLoS ONE, 01 January 2014, Vol.9(1) [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)

Full text available

3
Material Type:
Article
Add to My workspace

Correction: Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) in Clinical Trials: Is ‘In-Trial’ Guidance Lacking? A Systematic Review

PLoS One, Jan 2014, Vol.9(1) [Peer Reviewed Journal]

© ProQuest LLC All rights reserved

Full text available

4
Material Type:
Article
Add to My workspace

Erratum: Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) in Clinical Trials: Is 'In-Trial' Guidance Lacking? A Systematic Review (PLoS ONE (2014) 9:1 (DOI:10.1371/ annotation/e7d2b920-2c2a-425e-b500-982cd72f4d64))

PLoS ONE, 2 January 2014, Vol.9(1) [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Scopus (Elsevier B.V)

No full-text

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait