skip to main content
Show Results with:

Male reproductive strategy explains spatiotemporal segregation in brown bears.

The Journal of animal ecology, July 2013, Vol.82(4), pp.836-845 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

No full-text

View all versions
  • Title:
    Male reproductive strategy explains spatiotemporal segregation in brown bears.
  • Author: Steyaert, Sam M J G ; Kindberg, Jonas ; Swenson, Jon E ; Zedrosser, Andreas
  • Contributor: Steyaert, Sam M J G (correspondence author) ; Steyaert, Sam M J G (record owner)
  • Found In: The Journal of animal ecology, July 2013, Vol.82(4), pp.836-845 [Peer Reviewed Journal]
  • Subjects: Animals–Physiology ; Demography–Physiology ; Female–Physiology ; Male–Physiology ; Seasons–Physiology ; Sexual Behavior, Animal–Physiology ; Ursidae–Physiology ; Ursus Arctos ; Nonparental Infanticide ; Reproductive Strategy ; Resource Selection ; Risk Effects ; Risk Factor ; Segregation ; Sexual Selection ; Sexual Size Dimorphism
  • Language: English
  • Description: Spatiotemporal segregation is often explained by the risk for offspring predation or by differences in physiology, predation risk vulnerability or competitive abilities related to size dimorphism. Most large carnivores are size dimorphic and offspring predation is often intraspecific and related to nonparental infanticide (NPI). NPI can be a foraging strategy, a strategy to reduce competition, or a male reproductive strategy. Spatiotemporal segregation is widespread among large carnivores, but its nature remains poorly understood. We evaluated three hypotheses to explain spatiotemporal segregation in the brown bear, a size‐dimorphic large carnivore in which NPI is common; the ‘NPI – foraging/competition hypothesis', i.e. NPI as a foraging strategy or a strategy to reduce competition, the ‘NPI – sexual selection hypothesis’, i.e. infanticide as a male reproductive strategy and the ‘body size hypothesis’, i.e. body‐size‐related differences in physiology, predation risk vulnerability or competitive ability causes spatiotemporal segregation. To test these hypotheses, we quantified spatiotemporal segregation among adult males, lone adult females and females with cubs‐of‐the‐year, based on GPS‐relocation data (2006–2010) and resource selection functions in a Scandinavian population. We found that spatiotemporal segregation was strongest between females with cubs‐of‐the‐year and adult males during the mating season. During the mating season, females with cubs‐of‐the‐year selected their resources, in contrast to adult males, in less rugged landscapes in relative close proximity to certain human‐related variables, and in more open habitat types. After the mating season, females with cubs‐of‐the‐year markedly shifted their resource selection towards a pattern more similar to that of their conspecifics. No strong spatiotemporal segregation was apparent between females with cubs‐of‐the‐year and conspecifics during the mating and the postmating season. The ‘NPI – sexual selection hypothesis’ best explained spatiotemporal segregation in our study system. We suggest that females with cubs‐of‐the‐year alter their resource selection to avoid infanticidal males. In species exhibiting NPI as a male reproductive strategy, female avoidance of infanticidal males is probably more common than observed or reported, and may come with a fitness cost if females trade safety for optimal resources. The authors quantify spatiotemporal segregation between various reproductive classes of brown bears using resource selection modelling. They find that sexually selected infanticide best explains the observed segregation, and that infanticide risk avoidance can be a very complex and fine scaled spatiotemporal mechanism. The results indicate that females with dependent young probably use human shields to lower the risk for infanticide.
  • Identifier: E-ISSN: 1365-2656 ; DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12055

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait