skip to main content
Show Results with:

Eliciting women's cervical screening preferences: a mixed methods systematic review protocol

Wood, Brianne et al.

Systematic reviews. Volume 5:Issue 1 (2016); pp 1-7 -- BioMed Central

Online access

  • Title:
    Eliciting women's cervical screening preferences: a mixed methods systematic review protocol
  • Author: Wood, Brianne;
    Van Katwyk, Susan;
    El-Khatib, Ziad;
    McFaul, Susan;
    Taljaard, Monica;
    Wright, Erica;
    Graham, Ian;
    Little, Julian
  • Found In: Systematic reviews. Volume 5:Issue 1 (2016); pp 1-7
  • Journal Title: Systematic reviews
  • Subjects: Systematic reviews (Medical research)--Periodicals; Dewey: 616.0072
  • Rights: legaldeposit
  • Publication Details: BioMed Central
  • Abstract: AbstractBackgroundWith the accumulation of evidence regarding potential harms of cancer screening in recent years, researchers, policy-makers, and the public are becoming more critical of population-based cancer screening. Consequently, a high-quality cancer screening program should consider individuals' values and preferences when determining recommendations. In cervical cancer screening, offering women autonomy is considered a "person-centered" approach to health care services; however, it may impact the effectiveness of the program should women choose to not participate. As part of a larger project to investigate women's cervical screening preferences and correlates of these preferences, this systematic review will capture quantitative and qualitative investigations of women's cervical screening preferences and the methods used to elicit them.Design and methodsThis mixed methods synthesis will use a thematic analysis approach to synthesize qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods evidence. This protocol describes the methods that will be used in this investigation. A search strategy has been developed with a health librarian and peer reviewed using PRESS. Based on this strategy, five databases and the gray literature will be searched for studies that meet the inclusion criteria. The quality of the included individual studies will be examined using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Three reviewers will extract data from the primary studies on the tools or instruments used to elicit women's preferences regarding cervical cancer screening, theoretical frameworks used, outcomes measured, the outstanding themes from quantitative and qualitative evidence, and the identified preferences for cervical cancer screening. We will describe the relationships between study results and the study population, "intervention" (e.g., tool or instrument), and context. We will follow the PRISMA reporting guideline. We will compare findings across studies and between study methods (e.g., qualitative versus quantitative study designs). The strength of the synthesized findings will be assessed using the validated GRADE and CERQual tool.DiscussionThis review will inform the development of a tool to elicit women's cervical screening preferences. Understanding the methods used to elicit women's preferences and what is known about women's cervical screening preferences will be useful for guideline developers who wish to incorporate a woman-centered approach specifically for cervical screening guidelines.Systematic review registrationPROSPEROCRD42016035737
  • Identifier: System Number: LDEAvdc_100080695477.0x000001; Journal ISSN: 2046-4053; 10.1186/s13643-016-0310-9
  • Publication Date: 2016
  • Physical Description: Electronic
  • Shelfmark(s): ELD Digital store

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait