skip to main content
Show Results with:

The impact of automating laboratory request forms on the quality of healthcare services

Dogether, Majed Al et al.

Journal of infection and public health -- Elsevier Limited -- Volume: 9 6; (pages 749-756) -- 2016

Online access

  • Title:
    The impact of automating laboratory request forms on the quality of healthcare services
  • Author: Dogether, Majed Al;
    Muallem, Yahya Al;
    Househ, Mowafa;
    Saddik, Basema;
    Khalifa, Mohamed
  • Found In: Journal of infection and public health. Volume 9:Number 6(2016); 201611; 749-756
  • Journal Title: Journal of infection and public health
  • Subjects: Communicable diseases; Public health; Epidemiology; Nosocomial infections Prevention; Medical microbiology; LCSH: Communicable diseases; LCSH: Public health; LCSH: Epidemiology; LCSH: Nosocomial infections Prevention; LCSH: Medical microbiology; Dewey: 614.4
  • Rights: Licensed
  • Publication Details: Elsevier Limited
  • Abstract: SummaryIn recent decades, healthcare organizations have undergone a significant transformation with the integration of Information and Communication Technologies within healthcare operations to improve healthcare services. Various technologies such as Hospital Information Systems (HIS), Electronic Health Records (EHR) and Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) have been incorporated into healthcare services. The aim of this study is to evaluate the completeness of outpatients' laboratory paper based request forms in comparison with a electronic laboratory request system. This study was carried out in the laboratory department at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. We used a sample size calculator for comparing two proportions. We estimated the sample size to be 228 for each group. Any laboratory requests including paper and electronic forms were included. We categorized the clarity of the forms into understandable, readable, and unclear. A total of 57 incomplete paper forms or 25% were identified as being incomplete. For electronic forms, there were no incomplete fields, as all fields were mandatory, therefore, rendering them complete. The total of understandable paper-based laboratory forms was 11.4%. Additionally, it was found that the total of readable was 33.8% and the total for unclear was 54.8%, while for electronic-based forms, there were no unclear forms. Electronic based laboratory forms provide a more complete, accurate, clear, and understandable format than paper-based laboratory records. Based on these findings, KAMC should move toward the implementation of electronic-based laboratory request forms for the outpatient laboratory department.
  • Identifier: Journal ISSN: 1876-0341
  • Publication Date: 2016
  • Physical Description: Electronic
  • Shelfmark(s): ELD Digital store
    5006.491300
  • UIN: ETOCvdc_100036711550.0x000001

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait